Support Local Businesses.

Understanding the Miranda Warning

Henry Wade | November 19, 2009

You may have never heard the words spoken directly to you before, but in one way or another you are probably familiar with this phrase:

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand your rights?

But what does it all mean, and why are these statements so frequently recited?

As criminal defense lawyer Henry Wade, of The Wade Law Firm in Texas explains, the statements have become a statute of law developed out of the verdict from the case, Miranda v. Arizona, and a number of subsequent cases.

Miranda Warning

According to Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute, in 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested and charged for robbery in Arizona. While in police custody, Miranda signed a written confession to the robbery and several other crimes he had committed but had not yet been charged with. Relying solely on his confession, the prosecutor was able to convince the court of Miranda’s guilt. After his conviction, Miranda’s lawyers appealed the decision to the Arizona Supreme Court, arguing that Miranda did not know he had Constitutional rights that protected him from self-incrimination. After the appeal was ultimately dismissed by the Arizona Supreme Court, it was brought in front of the Supreme Court for review in 1966.

The Supreme Court ruled that anything a defendant said while in custody of the police could not be used as evidence to prosecute them, unless they were first informed of their right to remain silent. The ruling said that the Constitution’s fifth and sixth amendments provided individuals with the rights to refuse to be a witness against themselves, as well as the right to an attorney.

In order to ensure that these rights remained protected, the Court developed a set of statements that officers must recite to any defendant who is being arrested or questioned. It has since become the practice across the country, although the wording sometimes varies. Once this warning, now referred to as Miranda Warning, is issued, and the suspect replies that he understands that everything that is admitted to or spoken about can become legal evidence.

About Henry Wade

Author Name

Henry Wade has been practicing law in Texas for over 20 years. He received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Southern Methodist University in 1977 and graduated magna cum laude from Texas Tech University School of Law in 1988. In 1988, Wade was licensed by the State Bar of Texas and is a member of the Dallas Bar Association, State Bar of Texas, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Serving as an assistant district attorney in Dallas and Bell counties from 1989 to 1991, Wade was the felony prosecutor in over 100 jury trials, including murder, aggravated robbery and drug distribution. From 1995 to 1998, he served as judge of County Criminal Court No.1 in Dallas County and was elected by his peers as local administrative judge to oversee both criminal and civil county courts. In 1996, he was elected as judge of the 292nd Judicial District Court in Dallas County and handled felony cases ranging from theft to capital murder and presided over plea negotiations, bench trials and jury trials. Since 2007, Wade has been a member of The Wade Law Firm, P.C. as a general trial attorney with an emphasis on criminal litigation at both the state and federal levels. He is qualified as an expert witness and has testified in criminal law matters.

The Law office of Henry Wade

12700 Preston Rd Suite 265
Dallas,TX 75230
Visit Website

Find criminal defense lawyers

Locate Nearby criminal defense lawyers, Today!

What People Are Saying.

No Comments

Be the first to comment!

Leave a comment